Blog /
Daylight Editorial Team
The people behind Daylight's research on how clients find therapists online: Google, directories and AI assistants. We publish what we measure across real practices, and cite the research we rely on.
Our standards
- Every claim has a source
- Figures come from peer-reviewed research, professional bodies, government data, or our own measurements. Every source is linked, and every quotation is checked word for word against the source before an article goes live.
- Our own data, described plainly
- When we cite Daylight data, we say how many practices it covers, when it was collected and how it was measured. We only ever report totals across practices, never individual practices.
- No paid placements
- Nobody pays to be mentioned. We don't link to companies that sell what we sell, and we don't quote them as authorities.
- Dated, and kept current
- Each article shows when it was published and when it last changed. When the evidence changes, the article changes with it, and the date says so.
- Not clinical or legal advice
- We write about how practices are found and run. For anything about patient care, licensure or law, ask your board, your professional association or a lawyer.
- How these articles are made
- We use software, including AI writing tools, to research and draft. What gets published has to pass checks for sources, accuracy and originality. Anything that fails is held back for a person to look at.
Clinical review
We're adding a licensed clinician to review our articles. Until then, no article claims a clinical review, and none gives clinical advice.
Corrections
If something we've written is wrong or out of date, tell us at hello@dylt.ai. We fix it and change the article's updated date.